ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Detection and Location of Defects in Externally Bonded FRP Concrete Structures-Comparison of Selected Methods.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infrared Thermography for Defect Detectability in Structural Health Monitoring of Concrete Structures: Heat Transfer Physics, Resolution Limits, and AI-Assisted Diagnostics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Effect of Temperature (20-700 °C) on the Properties of Prestressing Steel Using AE Signals and FEM Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper compares three nondestructive methods used to detect and locate defects such as delaminations or voids in externally bonded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) concrete structures: infrared thermography, ground-penetrating radar, and measurement of acoustic wave velocity. One of the main goals was to check whether it was possible to distinguish overlapping defects. For this purpose, eight concrete samples were made with a bonded carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) strip with the following dimensions 100 × 100 × 500 mm. Two samples had no defects, four had single defects varying in location (at the edge of the strip or in the centre) simulating delamination or voids in the concrete cover, and the remaining samples had overlapping defects. Both infrared thermography and acoustic wave velocity measurement methods allow the detection of defects/voids in the adhesive layer and a concrete defect (void in the concrete cover). However, ground penetration failed to detect defects in the adhesive layer. Only infrared thermography allows for the differentiation of overlapping defects. On the basis of the conducted research, the methodology, differences, advantages, and limitations of each method were described, along with recommendations based on the authors' experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.