Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303710›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Feature-Guided Machine Learning for Studying Passive Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability to Aid Drug Discovery.

Baining Zhu, Suwei Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baining ZhuPhillips Exeter Academy, Exeter, NH 03833, USA.
Suwei LiuMechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective prediction of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability remains essential for central nervous system drug development. This study evaluates multiple supervised machine learning models using a public dataset of permeable and non-permeable compounds. Random Forest models demonstrate optimal balance between accuracy and generalizability, outperforming more complex gradient boosting methods that were prone to overfitting. Feature analysis identifies NH/OH and NO group counts as key determinants of passive diffusion, with reduced hydrogen bond donor and heteroatom counts enhancing permeability. Additionally, model performance deteriorates at NH/OH count = 3, establishing this as a decision boundary where hydrogen bonding complexity disrupts reliable prediction. This study shows the non-linear structure-permeability relationships that challenge traditional descriptor-based approaches, while demonstrating that machine learning can simultaneously provide both accurate prediction and applicable insights for drug discovery applications.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningHumansPermeabilityblood–brain barrierdrug discoverymachine learningpermeability prediction

Identifiers

PMID41303710
PMCPMC12653110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.