Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303698›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Mechanistic Evaluation of Radical Scavenging Pathways in Ginger Phenolics: A DFT Study of 6-Gingerol, 6-Shogaol, and 6-Paradol.

Hassane Lgaz, Mouslim Messali, Han-Seung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hassane LgazInnovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center, Center for Creative Convergence Education, Hanyang University ERICA, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangrok-gu, Ansan-si 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8506-5759
Mouslim MessaliDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), P.O. Box 90950, Riyadh 11623, Saudi Arabia.
Han-Seung LeeDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University ERICA, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangrok-gu, Ansan-si 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9776-5859

Funding

Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University IMSIU-DDRSP2503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the molecular determinants of antioxidant activity in natural phenolic compounds is essential for explaining their biological performance and designing new radical scavengers. In this work, the radical-scavenging mechanisms of three major ginger phenolics-6-gingerol (GIN), 6-shogaol (SHO), and 6-paradol (PAR)-were systematically investigated using density functional theory (DFT) thermochemistry at the M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) level in the gas phase, benzene, and water. Three canonical pathways-hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), single-electron transfer followed by proton transfer (SET-PT), and sequential proton loss-electron transfer (SPLET)-were evaluated through full optimization and frequency calculations at 298.15 K, combined with the SMD solvation model. Frontier molecular orbital (FMO), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), and quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) analyses were employed to correlate electronic structure with reactivity. The results reveal a distinct solvent-dependent mechanistic crossover. In the gas phase and benzene, the low dielectric constant suppresses charge separation, making HAT the thermodynamically dominant pathway. In water, strong stabilization of ionic species lowers both the ionization and deprotonation barriers, allowing SPLET and SET-PT to become competitive or even preferred. Across all media, the phenolic O-H group is the principal reactive site, while the aliphatic O-H of GIN remains inactive. SHO exhibits the most versatile redox profile, combining a highly conjugated α,β-unsaturated chain with favorable charge delocalization; PAR is somewhat less redox-active, while GIN shows intermediate performance governed by intramolecular hydrogen bonding. The assembled thermodynamics for HOO• scavenging confirm that all three phenolics are thermodynamically competent antioxidants (ΔG° ≈ -4 kcal mol

Indexed as

CatecholsFatty AlcoholsFree Radical ScavengersPhenolsZingiber officinaleDensity Functional TheoryModels, MolecularThermodynamicsWaterCatecholsFatty AlcoholsFree Radical ScavengersgingerolPhenolsshogaolWater6-gingerol6-paradol6-shogaolantioxidant mechanismsdensity functional theoryhydrogen atom transferhydroperoxyl radicalmolecular reactivity descriptorsQTAIM analysissequential proton loss–electron transfersingle-electron transfer–proton transfersolvent effectsthermochemistry

Identifiers

PMID41303698
PMCPMC12652960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.