ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Non-Coeliac Wheat Sensitivity: Symptoms in Search of a Mechanism, or a Distinct Well-Defined Clinical Entity? A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS) is characterised by gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms following gluten/wheat ingestion in individuals without coeliac disease or wheat allergy but remains controversial due to symptom overlap with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive, critical analysis of NCWS as a clinical and biological entity, examining the evidence for its distinction from related disorders. While self-reported rates are high (often >10%) in the general population, rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge (DBPCC) studies confirm the diagnosis in only a minority of cases (typically <30%). The clinical presentation is heterogeneous, combining IBS-like symptoms with systemic complaints such as "brain fog," headaches, and fatigue. The pathophysiology is distinct from coeliac disease, involving innate immune activation, altered intestinal barrier function, and gut dysbiosis. Non-gluten wheat components, particularly fructans and amylase-trypsin inhibitors, are implicated as potential triggers. Diagnosis is challenging, requiring the exclusion of other disorders and adherence to complex dietary challenge protocols such as the Salerno Experts' Criteria, which are impractical for routine clinical use. The search for validated biomarkers is a key research area and investigated candidates include serological markers such as IgG anti-gliadin antibodies, inflammatory markers such as faecal calprotectin, and proteins related to intestinal permeability such as zonulin, but results have been conflicting and require further validation. Management primarily involves elimination of wheat and gluten from the diet, although a low-FODMAP diet has also proven effective as an adjunctive treatment. In conclusion, NCWS is a clinical entity whose study and management are critically hampered by the absence of validated diagnostic criteria and biomarkers. Progress requires methodologically rigorous DBPCC trials to elucidate its mechanisms and develop reliable diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.