Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303655›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Non-Coeliac Wheat Sensitivity: Symptoms in Search of a Mechanism, or a Distinct Well-Defined Clinical Entity? A Narrative Review.

Stiliano Maimaris, Chiara Scarcella, Giusi Aurora Memoli, Carlotta Crisciotti, Annalisa Schiepatti, Federico Biagi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stiliano MaimarisDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2057-8179
Chiara ScarcellaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Via Salvatore Maugeri 10, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Giusi Aurora MemoliDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Carlotta CrisciottiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-8085-1098
Annalisa SchiepattiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-7698
Federico BiagiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2227-4622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS) is characterised by gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms following gluten/wheat ingestion in individuals without coeliac disease or wheat allergy but remains controversial due to symptom overlap with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive, critical analysis of NCWS as a clinical and biological entity, examining the evidence for its distinction from related disorders. While self-reported rates are high (often >10%) in the general population, rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge (DBPCC) studies confirm the diagnosis in only a minority of cases (typically <30%). The clinical presentation is heterogeneous, combining IBS-like symptoms with systemic complaints such as "brain fog," headaches, and fatigue. The pathophysiology is distinct from coeliac disease, involving innate immune activation, altered intestinal barrier function, and gut dysbiosis. Non-gluten wheat components, particularly fructans and amylase-trypsin inhibitors, are implicated as potential triggers. Diagnosis is challenging, requiring the exclusion of other disorders and adherence to complex dietary challenge protocols such as the Salerno Experts' Criteria, which are impractical for routine clinical use. The search for validated biomarkers is a key research area and investigated candidates include serological markers such as IgG anti-gliadin antibodies, inflammatory markers such as faecal calprotectin, and proteins related to intestinal permeability such as zonulin, but results have been conflicting and require further validation. Management primarily involves elimination of wheat and gluten from the diet, although a low-FODMAP diet has also proven effective as an adjunctive treatment. In conclusion, NCWS is a clinical entity whose study and management are critically hampered by the absence of validated diagnostic criteria and biomarkers. Progress requires methodologically rigorous DBPCC trials to elucidate its mechanisms and develop reliable diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

TriticumWheat HypersensitivityBiomarkersCeliac DiseaseGlutensHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeBiomarkersGlutensglutengluten-free-dietnon-coeliac gluten sensitivitynon-coeliac wheat sensitivitywheat

Identifiers

PMID41303655
PMCPMC12652921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.