ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Validation of the Monocyte Activation Test Demonstrating Equivalence to the Rabbit Pyrogen Test.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Monocyte Activation Test (MAT) is an in vitro assay that uses human blood cells to detect both endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens (NEPs), representing a scientifically and ethically superior alternative to the in vivo Rabbit Pyrogen Test (RPT). In the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), the MAT is a compendial method which is explicitly recommended to replace the RPT, requiring only product-specific verification. In contrast, the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) lacks a dedicated MAT chapter, meaning the MAT can only be accepted as an alternative method, given that a full method validation according to USP <1225> is provided in addition to a product-specific verification. This study presents a two-tiered validation strategy addressing both regulatory frameworks: a generic (product-independent) validation aligned with the semi-quantitative test method according to Ph. Eur., ICH Q2, and USP <1225> followed by a product-specific verification. The generic validation consisted of the following parameters: Range and Linearity, Limit of Detection, Accuracy, Specificity, Precision, and Robustness. Robustness was extensively tested under routine-relevant conditions, including variation in the stimulation time, IL-6 read-out timing, freeze-thaw stability, and lot-to-lot comparability. Additionally, an equivalency study of the RPT and the MAT was performed. The data showed that the MAT is at least non-inferior if not superior to the RPT and met the requirements for successful FDA approval of the MAT as an alternative method for pyrogen testing. The MAT was successfully applied to several parenteral drug products. This work provides a transferable framework for GMP-compliant MAT implementation and supports broader international acceptance of the method as a replacement for the RPT in pharmaceutical quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.