Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303568›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

From CMS to iCMS/IMF: Developing Roadmap to Precision Therapy in Colorectal Cancer.

Sungwon Jung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The Need for a Systems Biology Approach in Cancer Explained.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sungwon JungDepartment of Genome Medicine and Science, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon 21565, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6002-554X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2022-NR069378National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2025-18732993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) classification has progressed from consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) to epithelial-intrinsic consensus molecular subtypes (iCMS) and the layered intrinsic subtype-MSI-fibrosis (IMF) system that combines intrinsic state, MSI status, and fibrosis. This article reviews biological underpinnings of iCMS/IMF, their relationships to tumor-microenvironment crosstalk, and how single-cell and spatial transcriptomics refine therapeutic stratification by resolving tumor microenvironment heterogeneity and its impact on fibrosis. Prognostic and therapeutic implications are covered, including PD-1 blockade in MSI-high (MSI-H), MAPK-directed therapy in BRAF-mutant disease, and EGFR targeting in selected RAS wild-type (WT) left-sided tumors, and we suggest decision points specifically informed by the activity of the fibrosis axis. A step-by-step procedure is presented for the analysis of bulk and single-cell RNA and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) resources, along with open-source tools and reporting standards to make iCMS/IMF calling reproducible in clinics and trials. Future outlooks are outlined with near-term biomarker-drug hypotheses for microsatellite-stable (MSS)-iCMS3 and high fibrosis tumors and key gaps to close for clinical translation. This review outlines a roadmap for precision medicine in colorectal cancer by leveraging the iCMS/IMF framework to integrate pathology and digital pathology, molecular diagnostics, and therapy mapping with FAP-targeted imaging and therapy.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorFibrosisHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorCMScolorectal cancerfibrosisiCMSIMFsingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID41303568
PMCPMC12652317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.