ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Genetics and Neurobiology of Treatment-Resistant Depression-A Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Exosomes in the Regulation of Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Treatment Resistance-Linking Cellular Crosstalk to Clinical Implications in Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Physical Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Evidence Grading.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD), defined as the failure to achieve adequate response to at least two antidepressant trials, affects 20-30% of patients with major depressive disorder and poses substantial personal and socioeconomic burdens. This review aimed to synthesize current knowledge on the genetic, epigenetic, and neurobiological underpinnings of TRD to understand its pathophysiology better and inform future treatment strategies. A systematic search identified relevant studies focusing on genetic predispositions, epigenetic modifications, structural and functional brain alterations, the role of chronic inflammation, and deficits in neuroplasticity and neurogenesis associated with TRD. Findings highlight the involvement of polymorphisms in genes regulating neurotransmission, neuroplasticity, and stress response, though replication across studies remains inconsistent. Genome-wide association studies suggest polygenic contributions but are limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneous definitions of TRD. Emerging evidence points to aberrant DNA methylation, histone modifications, and dysregulated non-coding RNAs as potential mediators of treatment resistance. Neuroimaging studies reveal TRD-specific patterns, particularly altered default mode network connectivity and white matter disruptions, supporting its distinction as a subtype of depression. Collectively, the evidence underscores TRD as a multifactorial condition shaped by genetic and neurobiological factors, while emphasizing the need for standardized definitions, larger cohorts, and longitudinal designs to advance the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.