ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Genomics and Epigenomics Approaches for the Quantification of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsy: Relevance of a Multimodal Strategy.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker of Treatment Response and Minimal Residual Disease in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Autophagy-Circulating Tumor DNA Axis in Molecular Cancer Research: Emerging Mechanisms, Therapeutic Targeting, and Translational Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Navigating the molecular landscape: integrated multiomics liquid biopsy for biomarker discovery in early detection and monitoring of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adoption of liquid biopsy approaches in clinical practice has triggered a significant paradigm shift in the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive outcomes for cancer patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is considered a valuable biomarker for monitoring tumor burden and its mutational dynamics. In this context, not all cell-free DNA (cfDNA) molecules are derived from tumor cells. Furthermore, due to tumor heterogeneity, not all ctDNA molecules contain cancer-associated alleles, complicating the direct quantification of the circulating tumor allele fraction (cTF) within the total cfDNA. Cancer arises from the accumulation of multiple genetic and epigenetic changes. Each of these molecular features can be exploited as the basis of methodological strategies used in ctDNA quantification. Different layers of omics data, from genomics, evaluating mutational analysis of somatic single-nucleotide variants and copy number alterations, to epigenomics, primarily consisting of the evaluation of methylation profiles and fragmentation patterns, can be used for this purpose. Some of these approaches can be effective in a multi-modal manner. To date, the quantification approaches for estimating cTF vary enormously, making direct comparisons and an assessment of their translational value challenging. Moreover, the lack of regulatory approval for many of these assays is a critical barrier to their widespread clinical adoption. This review explores the different omics approaches described for ctDNA quantification, outlining strengths and limitations, and highlighting their valuable applications in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.