ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Advantages and Disadvantages of Commonly Used Urinary Incontinence Questionnaires-How to Correctly Choose Questionnaire in Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Surgical Evaluation in Stress Urinary Incontinence by Transperineal Ultrasound and Quality of Life Questionnaire-A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Hungarian Version of Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7) Among Hungarian Women: A Validation Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Urodynamic Studies in Female Patients with Non-Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Retrospective Analysis.Urology research & practice · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and predictors of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder as components of lower urinary tract symptoms among female healthcare professionals.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Multidimensional assessment of urinary dysfunction and quality of life after cervical cancer treatment: a multicenter study integrating urodynamics and patient-reported outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.