Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303172›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Selective Removal of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Combined with Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP): Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Anton Sabashnikov, Sanjay Agrawal, Bartlomiej Zych, Ihor Krasivskyi, Syed Hussain Abbas, Dengu Fungai, Thomas Williams, Louit Thakuria, Andrew Aswani, Mohamed Osman and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anton SabashnikovGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Sanjay AgrawalGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Bartlomiej ZychGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Ihor KrasivskyiGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-8218
Syed Hussain AbbasGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Dengu FungaiGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Thomas WilliamsGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Louit ThakuriaGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Andrew AswaniGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Mohamed OsmanGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Maria Monteagudo-VelaGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Vasiliki GerovasiliGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.
Anna ReedGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield UB9 6JH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe discrepancy between availability of donor organs suitable for clinical transplantation and the proportion of patients on the waiting list has resulted in several clinical problems. First, waiting times for a suitable organ match have become increasingly long, leading to higher mortality while awaiting transplantation. Second, to address this issue, more "marginal" donor lungs have been used in the last two decades, inevitably leading to higher risk of perioperative and long-term complications. The ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) technology has been used to recondition marginal donor organs for clinical transplantation. There remains a further untapped pool of donor organs that are currently deemed too injured even for reconditioning via currently available EVLP strategies and are therefore discarded without reconditioning attempts. As the clinical use of EVLP has reached its full potential, further adjunct technologies, such as selective NET removal, cytokine removal and cell therapy techniques, may improve reconditioning outcomes and lead to increased number of donor organs transplanted. Moreover, NET removal may significantly improve donor organ quality and, therefore, the outcomes of recipients after lung transplantation. Such adjunct technology may also provide short- and longer-term benefits in reduction in early graft failure (primary graft dysfunction, PGD) and longer-term chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD, previously known as chronic rejection) via more favorable early immune priming of organs. In this article we present current evidence and future perspectives on this novel intervention strategy that can be used on human donor lungs with the view to increase the utilization rate in lung transplantation in the near future.

Indexed as

ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP)lung transplantationneutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)

Identifiers

PMID41303172
PMCPMC12653239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.