Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303151›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

AI in Pediatric Spine Care: Clinical, Research, and Ethical Considerations.

Hans K Nugraha, Adam P Rasmussen, Kellen L Mulford, Linjun Yang, Cody C Wyles, A Noelle Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hans K NugrahaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL 32806, USA.
Adam P RasmussenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Kellen L MulfordOrthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Linjun YangOrthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1430-3355
Cody C WylesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8629-7567
A Noelle LarsonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-6975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping pediatric spine care, leveraging its rapid advancements in healthcare to improve efficiency, accuracy, and disease understanding. Moreover, machine learning and deep learning excel at detecting complex patterns. This holds promise in processing spinal deformity data, with the potential to surpass traditional statistical methods in predictive accuracy. Challenges persist, however, including unclear clinical implementation guidelines, limited model transparency, and ethical concerns surrounding data privacy and bias. Small sample sizes and the need for larger, diverse datasets further complicate integration. In order to realize AI's transformative potential in pediatric spine care, these critical obstacles must be addressed for effective and ethical clinical adoption. This review examines the role of AI through applications such as image sorting, surgical outcome prediction, forecasting of spinal curve progression, and vertebral volumetric analysis using deep reasoning. It also explores possible intraoperative contributions from AI, including robotics and optimized screw trajectory planning, and the potential of large language models in clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencelarge language modelingmachine learningpediatric spine

Identifiers

PMID41303151
PMCPMC12653160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.