Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41302965›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

Integrating Computational Modelling into the Ecosystem of Cochlear Implantation: Advancing Access to Diagnostics, Decision-Making, and Post-Implantation Outcomes on a Global Scale.

Tania Hanekom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tania HanekomBioengineering, Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2455-7332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disabling hearing loss affects more than 5% of the global population, with numbers expected to double by 2050. The burden is especially high in low- and middle-income countries, where access to cochlear implant (CI) technology and the required follow-up care is limited. While CIs are a proven treatment for certain types of hearing loss, their adoption in these countries is hindered by high costs, the need for specialised rehabilitation, and the financial and time commitment required for long-term device maintenance. Although remote programming has improved accessibility to standard care, specialised interventions for complications remain restricted mainly to areas with clinical centres. Computational modelling offers a promising solution to this access-to-care dilemma. The models may be used to simulate complications, such as non-auditory stimulation (NAS), to investigate and plan personalised interventions, and ultimately predict device parameters, without requiring the recipient's physical presence. Both phenomenological and biophysical models have already demonstrated useful application in CIs: the former streamlines clinical workflows and aims to establish consistency in device fitting, and the latter provides insights into patient-specific auditory biophysiology. Despite decades of research, clinical translation of biophysical models has been limited by data constraints, parameter uncertainty, and validation challenges. In this perspective piece, it is argued that biophysical models have now reached sufficient maturity to be integrated into routine CI care. Apart from the advantages that this approach will bring to the overall advancement of person-centred CI care, it is envisioned to improve accessibility, personalisation, and long-term outcomes for CI recipients in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

biophysical modelclinical implementationcochlear implantcomputational biophysiologymodel-facilitated care

Identifiers

PMID41302965
PMCPMC12653528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.