Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Claudiu-Nicusor IonicaDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0140-013X
Romelia PopDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0254-1823
Dragos HodorDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-288X
Irina ConstantinDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5668-3299
Ana HirutaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3515-2560
Alexia-Teodora HotaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0009-0005-5292-164X
Alexandru Flaviu TabaranDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5744-0451
Sorana DainaDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-2277
Andrei-Radu SzakacsDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2012-0002
Adrian MacriDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manaștur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2579-8544
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Microplastic pollution is a pressing global concern, yet its immunotoxicological impacts on invertebrates remain poorly understood. The Black Soldier Fly (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Cellular Uptake and Tissue Retention of Microplastics in Black Soldier Fly Larvae. · full record | OpenQuestion