ArticleInsects2025
The Effects of Silver and Potassium Iodide on Honey Bee (
Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silver iodide (AgI) and potassium iodide (KI), which are used in cloud seeding, were administered to bees in a variety of pretreatments (low or high dosing) and analyzed through a series of experiments to determine the effect on bees' ability to learn. Cloud seeding is the process of dispersing chemicals into an already-formed cloud to attract water molecules that fall to Earth as rain or snow. These chemicals then enter the ecosystem through water and soil. Honey bees were used because they represent a robust and ecologically appropriate model organism to study the behavioral impacts of cloud seeding. The first experiment utilized a shuttle box to test whether honey bees could avoid shock in a punishment experiment. Results revealed that the majority of the pretreatments did inhibit bees' ability to learn to avoid shock. Experiment 2 consists of two proboscis extension reflex experiments (PER) where bees are trained to associate an odor with a sucrose feeding. Using the PER paradigm, we investigated simple conditioning and odor discrimination. Results revealed that in both the simple conditioning and discrimination experiments, learning was inhibited by the pretreatment of chemicals regardless of dosing amount. The final experiment explored reward discrimination in a free-flying flower patch paradigm. Results revealed that learning ability was not affected; however, return times were greatly impacted. Overall, results showed that AgI and KI throughout each experiment (i.e., shuttle box, PER, and free-flying discrimination) had some degree of negative effect on honey bee behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.