ArticleInsects2025
CropCLR-Wheat: A Label-Efficient Contrastive Learning Architecture for Lightweight Wheat Pest Detection.
Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address prevalent challenges in field-based wheat pest recognition-namely, viewpoint perturbations, sample scarcity, and heterogeneous data distributions-a pest identification framework named CropCLR-Wheat is proposed, which integrates self-supervised contrastive learning with an attention-enhanced mechanism. By incorporating a viewpoint-invariant feature encoder and a diffusion-based feature filtering module, the model significantly enhances pest damage localization and feature consistency, enabling high-accuracy recognition under limited-sample conditions. In 5-shot classification tasks, CropCLR-Wheat achieves a precision of 89.4%, a recall of 87.1%, and an accuracy of 88.2%; these metrics further improve to 92.3%, 90.5%, and 91.2%, respectively, under the 10-shot setting. In the semantic segmentation of wheat pest damage regions, the model attains a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 82.7%, with precision and recall reaching 85.2% and 82.4%, respectively, markedly outperforming advanced models such as SegFormer and Mask R-CNN. In robustness evaluation under viewpoint disturbances, a prediction consistency rate of 88.7%, a confidence variation of only 7.8%, and a prediction consistency score (PCS) of 0.914 are recorded, indicating strong stability and adaptability. Deployment results further demonstrate the framework's practical viability: on the Jetson Nano device, an inference latency of 84 ms, a frame rate of 11.9 FPS, and an accuracy of 88.2% are achieved. These results confirm the efficiency of the proposed approach in edge computing environments. By balancing generalization performance with deployability, the proposed method provides robust support for intelligent agricultural terminal systems and holds substantial potential for wide-scale application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.