Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41302822›Full record

ArticleInsects2025

Effect of Solvents on the Structure of the Gut Microbiota of Honeybees (

Kang Wang, Jinmeng Ma, Ting Ji, Haibo Zhang, Ling Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kang WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0009-0008-1893-0595
Jinmeng MaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Ting JiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9235-1996
Haibo ZhangSchool of Food Science and Technology, Jiangsu Agri-Animal Husbandry Vocational College, Taizhou 225300, China.
Ling YinSchool of Food Science and Technology, Jiangsu Agri-Animal Husbandry Vocational College, Taizhou 225300, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32402829Natural Science Foundation of Yangzhou YZ202416Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Jiangsu Agri-Animal Husbandry Vocational College NSF2023TC03State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects SKLRI-ORP202518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota of social bees is vital for host health, yet pesticide exposure can disrupt these communities. Because most active ingredients are poorly soluble, toxicological tests often use cosolvents, but their effects remain unclear. We assessed four common cosolvents (DMSO, DMF, acetone, and Tween 80) at laboratory-relevant concentrations on honeybee survival, pollen consumption, body weight, and gut microbiota. In parallel, in vitro assays tested their impact on five dominant gut symbionts. The results showed no significant changes in survival, feeding, body weight, bacterial load, community composition, or core taxa abundance. Similarly, cosolvents did not inhibit bacterial growth in vitro. These findings demonstrate that commonly used cosolvents exert no detectable influence on honeybee physiology or gut microbiota. Although negative, this evidence is critical: it rules out cosolvents as hidden confounders, improving confidence in pesticide toxicology studies and providing essential reference data for pollinator risk assessment.

Indexed as

acetonecosolventDMFDMSOgut microbiotahoneybeeTween 80

Identifiers

PMID41302822
PMCPMC12653335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.