ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Digital Health Literacy of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review to Map the Evidence.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital technologies are revolutionizing health systems worldwide. People with higher digital health literacy are better equipped to access reliable health information, utilize telehealth services, and effectively manage their health through applications. However, a notable digital divide exists for people with intellectual disabilities, and the digitization of healthcare can limit their health opportunities. This scoping review examines the current evidence on digital health literacy among people with intellectual disabilities, emphasizing specific challenges and the need for tailored adaptations. Eleven articles from ten databases were included in the review. Although digital health literacy is becoming increasingly important, it is rarely discussed for people with intellectual disabilities. The term "digital health literacy" is not used, with the exception of one article. However, the focus is mostly on applicability and often at the functional level. The findings underscore that people with intellectual disabilities are underrepresented in research studies and interventions related to digital health literacy. Additionally, the results indicate the lack of a theoretical population-specific framework that focuses on competencies and life experiences. Participation in the digital world is a human right (UN CRPD). Addressing the digital gap is crucial, as improving digital health literacy can lead to better health outcomes, equitable access to health services, and reduced health disparities among people with intellectual disabilities. Based on the results, research directions for developing a population-specific framework for this highly vulnerable group are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.