ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
A Comparative Policy Analysis of Health Inequities in Access to Healthcare Across Low- and High-Income Contexts: The Cases of Pakistan and Canada.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, poverty remains a major obstacle to health parity, compromising well-being. This policy analysis aims to examine how poverty affects health inequities and healthcare access in two contexts: Canada, a high-income nation, and Pakistan, a low-income nation. This study employs a grounded approach, integrating a thorough review of the existing critical literature using systematic thematic analysis and synthesis. In Pakistan, chronic underinvestment, rural-urban gaps, inadequate infrastructure, and political instability exacerbate inequities in access to healthcare. Limited coverage, ineffective administrative processes, and gaps in rural healthcare delivery impede growth despite encouraging programs like the Sehat Card and the Ehsaas Program. Conversely, universal healthcare in Canada has lowered financial obstacles to access, but low-income and Indigenous communities are still impacted by service gaps, particularly in dental care, pharmacare, and mental health. Although child poverty rates have been significantly reduced by programs like the Canada Child Benefit, Indigenous children continue to endure disproportionate health risks. Findings underscore a need for equity-driven changes: Pakistan must expand rural health infrastructure and legislate health equity, while Canada should extend coverage to essential but excluded services. Findings underscore the intersecting nature of inequities driven by poverty, gender, geography, and systemic exclusion that highlight opportunities for cross-context policy learning. Canada's equity monitoring frameworks could strengthen Pakistan's health data systems, while Pakistan's community-based Lady Health Worker program offers scalable grassroots models relevant for marginalized Canadian regions. Both countries must prioritize poverty alleviation as a health intervention, integrating justice, sustainability, and accountability to advance global health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.