Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41302680›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Understanding the Risks and Benefits of Implementing AI-Enabled Remote Patient Monitoring Systems for Disease Management.

Junaid Nabi, Richard Staynings, Javaid Iqbal Sofi, Henry H Willis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junaid NabiRAND School of Public Policy, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6170-0129
Richard StayningsCylera, Inc., New York, NY 10005, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3721-6051
Javaid Iqbal SofiVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3468-4065
Henry H WillisRAND School of Public Policy, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6404-721X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effectively managing risk is essential for fostering innovation in healthcare, especially with advancements like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). These technologies aim to enhance accessibility, efficiency, and equity in healthcare delivery. To assess the practical utility of AI-enabled remote patient monitoring (RPM) devices, it is crucial to identify and evaluate associated risks while distinguishing between acceptable risk, which society tolerates, and optimal risk, which balances risk reduction costs with benefits. This paper outlines how policymakers should adopt the framework of optimal risk to ensure patient safety while maximizing the advantages of these technologies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDisease ManagementRemote Sensing TechnologyHumansMachine LearningMonitoring, PhysiologicRemote Patient MonitoringRisk AssessmentTelemedicineAI-enabled remote patient monitoringalgorithmic accountabilitycybersecuritymachine learning systemspatient safetypolicy analysisregulatory frameworksrisk analysisrisk mitigationtechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID41302680
PMCPMC12652748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.