Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41302637›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Identifying Predictors of Utilization of Skilled Birth Attendance in Uganda Through Interpretable Machine Learning.

Shaheen M Z Memon, Robert Wamala, Ignace H Kabano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shaheen M Z MemonAfrican Centre of Excellence in Data Science, College of Business and Economics, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-7069-9270
Robert WamalaDepartment of Planning and Applied Statistics, College of Business and Management Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda.
Ignace H KabanoAfrican Centre of Excellence in Data Science, College of Business and Economics, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skilled Birth Attendance (SBA) is essential for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, yet access remains limited in many low- and middle-income countries. This study used machine learning to predict SBA use among Ugandan women and identify key influencing factors. We analyzed data from the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey, focusing on women aged 15 to 49 who had given birth in the preceding five years. After preparing and selecting relevant features, six tree-based models (decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) and logistic regression were applied. Class imbalance was addressed using cost-sensitive learning, and hyperparameters were tuned via Bayesian optimization. XGBoost performed best (F1-score: 0.52; recall: 0.73; AUC: 0.75). SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret model predictions. Key predictors of SBA use included education level, antenatal care visits, region (especially Northern Uganda), perceived distance to a healthcare facility, and urban or rural residence. The results demonstrate the value of interpretable machine learning for identifying at-risk populations and guiding targeted maternal health interventions in Uganda.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricMachine LearningAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPrenatal CareUgandaYoung Adultclass imbalanceclass weightsmachine learningmaternal healthcareSHAP explainabilityskilled birth attendance

Identifiers

PMID41302637
PMCPMC12652766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.