ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Integrating DHIS2 and R for Enhanced Cholera Surveillance in Lebanon: A Case Study on Improving Data Quality.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Climate-related disease registry in Lebanon: a proposed roadmap.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the 2022-2023 cholera outbreak in Lebanon, cases were reported through the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2). We developed automated procedures in R computing language to improve completeness of routinely notified variables, apply case definition criteria, improve geographic accuracy and documentation of laboratory results. We developed R scripts for data cleaning, standardization, and reclassification, plotted epidemic curves and produced maps to display cholera incidence rates and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) coverage by district. We shared the R scripts on GitHub platform for open adaptation and use. Prior to cleaning, missingness reached 99.7% for inpatient status and 17-35% for other key variables. After cleaning, all fields were complete. Initially, 92.8% of cases were notified through DHIS2 as suspected and 7.2% as confirmed. Following reclassification, 40% were classified as suspected, 5.8% as confirmed, and 48.6% with unspecified classification. Laboratory data revealed that 5.8% of cases were culture positive, 2.2% RDT positive, and 65.1% had no documented testing. Among facility-entered cases (n = 5953), 11.4% were reported from a different governorate than the patient's residence. At the time of the outbreak, the daily maps were generated based on place of residence. Integrating R-based analytics with DHIS2 enhanced data completeness, improved case classification, and enabled more better spatial and laboratory analysis. This combined approach provided a clearer epidemiological picture of the cholera outbreak, supporting data-driven public health decision-making and highlighting the value of integrating analytical tools with routine surveillance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.