ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
The Environmental Consequence of Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Literature Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Pathways.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Environmental impact of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a burden to healthcare globally, with early detection vital to improving outcomes. While screening and early diagnostic strategies are being widely implemented, their environmental impact remains underexplored. The purpose of this literature review is to examine the existing research on the environmental footprint of non-emergency sporadic CRC diagnostic pathways and provide an overview of environmental impact assessment processes. PRINCIPAL
findingsPopulation-based screening appears environmentally beneficial over time, but its efficiency critically determines its net impact. Studies identify endoscopy as having the highest environmental impact among testing modalities. The dominant contributor to this is patient and staff travel. By contrast, faecal-based tests appear to have the lowest environmental footprint. Notably, pathway-wide assessments are limited, and methodological inconsistencies hinder comparing studies.
conclusionsThere is an urgent need to standardise a healthcare sector-specific framework for environmental impact assessments. Emerging biomarker-based diagnostics will require a robust pathway-wide environmental impact assessment before clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.