Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41302227›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Dignity of Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence from Residents, Staff, and Relatives.

Dong-Mei Xue, Dan-Ni Wang, Ying Bian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dong-Mei XueState Key Laboratory of Mechanism and Quality of Chinese Medicine, University of Macau, Macao Special Administrative Region 999078, China.
Dan-Ni WangState Key Laboratory of Mechanism and Quality of Chinese Medicine, University of Macau, Macao Special Administrative Region 999078, China.
Ying BianState Key Laboratory of Mechanism and Quality of Chinese Medicine, University of Macau, Macao Special Administrative Region 999078, China.

Funding

University of Macau 2025 CPRS Research Project CPRS-0012University of Macau CPRS Research Project_V1_CHN_20240321 CPRS-0001University of Macau MYRG2019-00044-ICMSUniversity of Macau QRCM-IRG2022-001University of Macau SKL-QRCM-IRG2023-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesWith global population aging, long-term care (LTC) facilities play an essential role in supporting older adults. However, residents are vulnerable to dignity loss in these institutional settings. Understanding dignity from the perspectives of residents, staff, and relatives is critical for informing person-centered care and policy. This review aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence on dignity in LTC facilities across multiple stakeholders.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Wan Fang, VIP, and CNKI) for qualitative studies published in 2010-2023. Eligible studies explored experiences of dignity among older LTC residents, staff, or relatives. Methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Data were analysed through thematic synthesis, and findings were compared across stakeholder groups.

resultsA total of 1948 records were identified, of which 27 qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Two themes emerged from residents' perspectives: institutionalization and resilience in preserving dignity. From staff perspectives, three themes were identified: understaffing and workload pressures, general approaches to dignity care, and person-centered care. Relatives' accounts highlighted two themes: uneasiness regarding indignity and ethical expectations in a caring culture. Integrating these perspectives, we propose a triangular model in which residents, staff, and relatives collaboratively sustain dignity.

conclusionsOlder adults' dignity in LTC is shaped by complex interactions among institutional conditions, caregiving practices, and family involvement. Enhancing dignity requires adequate staffing, structural support for person-centered care, and greater involvement of relatives in decision-making. The proposed triangular model offers a framework for guiding interventions, staff training, and policy reforms aimed at safeguarding dignity in LTC facilities.

Indexed as

dignitylong-term care facilityolder adultqualitative evidence

Identifiers

PMID41302227
PMCPMC12652313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.