ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Standardized Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) Improves Effectiveness and Safety in Mixed Physician and Paramedic Hungarian EMS.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Ground Emergency Medical Services in Hungary are provided by the National Ambulance Service. Paramedics, physicians, and specialists in this service are competent in performing endotracheal intubation (ETI) on patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the standardized Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) procedure on safety and effectiveness. (2) Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted concerning the RSI procedure. Patient documentation from a 2-year implementation period was analyzed using a dedicated Case Report Form (CRF), where both RSI and non-RSI methods were used. Our primary endpoint was Definitive Airway Sans Hypoxia and Hypotension on First Attempt (DASH-1A). Our secondary endpoints included success on the first attempt; overall success; and hypoxia, hypotension, and cardiac arrest complications. (3) Results: In total, 6399 intubation cases were studied; non-RSI was used in 3236, and RSI was applied in 3163 cases. DASH-1A was attained in a significantly higher number of cases with RSI than non-RSI (55.0 vs. 68.5%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.