ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Feasibility Study of Co-Established Patient-Derived Subcutaneous Xenograft and Organotypic Slice Cultures in Hormone-Naive Primary Prostate Cancer Preclinical Modeling: A Single-Institution Experience.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic vulnerabilities in advanced prostate cancer: the interplay of ferroptosis, cuproptosis, and the inflammatory microenvironment.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreclinical models that preserve the tumor microenvironment are critically needed in prostate cancer (PCa) research. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and patient-derived Organotypic Slice Cultures (PD-OSCs) have emerged as promising in vivo and ex vivo platforms to address this gap and better mimic human tumor biology.
methodsSubcutaneous PDX models and PD-OSCs were established in parallel from fresh, primary hormone-naïve PCa patient tissues. PDX models were generated by engrafting tumor fragments into immunodeficient mice, while PD-OSCs were maintained as short-term ex vivo cultures for functional analysis.
resultsA cohort of 64 PDXs and 45 PD-OSCs was generated. While first-generation PDX engraftment was successful, subsequent passaging and model expansion were extremely poor. In contrast, PD-OSCs were reliably established, maintained tissue viability, and proved to be a robust platform for functional testing, including gene expression analysis and drug sensitivity screening.
conclusionsOur findings establish both first-generation PDXs and PD-OSCs as valuable "avatar" models for translational research. However, PD-OSCs represent a more efficient and rapid platform for studying primary hormone-naïve PCa biology and evaluating treatment responses, holding significant promise as a predictive tool to guide personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.