ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
PICU Face and Thoracoabdominal Detection Using Self-Supervised Divided Space-Time Mamba.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-contact vital sign monitoring in Pediatric Intensive Care Units is challenged by frequent occlusions, data scarcity, and the need for temporally stable anatomical tracking to extract reliable physiological signals. Traditional detectors produce unstable tracking, while video transformers are too computationally intensive for deployment on resource-limited clinical hardware. We introduce Divided Space-Time Mamba, an architecture that decouples spatial and temporal feature learning using State Space Models to achieve linear-time complexity, over 92% lower than standard transformers. To handle data scarcity, we employ self-supervised pre-training with masked autoencoders on over 50 k domain-specific video clips and further enhance robustness with multimodal RGB-D input. Our model demonstrates superior performance, achieving 0.96 mAP@0.5, 0.62 mAP50-95, and 0.95 rotated IoU. Operating at 23 FPS (43 ms latency), our method is approximately 1.9× faster than VideoMAE and 5.7× faster than frame-wise YOLOv8, demonstrating its suitability for real-time clinical monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.