ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Atresia in Adults: A Narrative Review of a Rare Entity and Emerging Technique.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thoracic aortic atresia in adults represents a rare and extreme manifestation of aortic coarctation, marked by complete luminal occlusion and frequently compensated by extensive collateral circulation. This narrative review critically evaluates existing literature and institutional experience concerning surgical and endovascular repair strategies for aortic atresia, synthesizing evidence from related aortic arch pathologies due to the absence of direct comparative studies. Both treatment modalities-open surgical repair and catheter-based recanalization with stenting-have evolved significantly, presenting distinct advantages and limitations influenced by patient anatomy, age, and comorbidities. While surgical repair remains the standard for neonates, infants, and complex cases due to superior long-term durability and blood pressure control, endovascular procedures using chronic total occlusion technique and covered stents offer less invasive alternatives with rapid recovery, particularly in adults with suitable anatomic characteristics. The review highlights procedural considerations, including technical approaches, stent selection, and potential complications such as restenosis, hypertension, and vascular injury. Individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making remains essential, with shared consensus guiding therapy in the absence of randomized trials. The article identifies critical gaps in knowledge, emphasizing the need for multicenter, long-term studies and technological advances-including hybrid and personalized strategies for optimal management and for improving outcomes in this challenging congenital condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.