ArticleBiomedicines2025
Best Practice PD-L1 Staining and Interpretation in Gastric Cancer Using PD-L1 IHC PharmDx 22C3 and PD-L1 IHC PharmDx 28-8 Assays, with Reference to Common Issues and Solutions.
Article in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Comprehensive Overview of Gastric Cancer Immunohistochemistry: Key Biomarkers, Advanced Detection Methods, and Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) biomarker testing in gastric cancer is required to identify patients suitable for immunotherapy. However, the PD-L1 testing landscape is complex, with various PD-L1 tests available and multiple algorithms that combine tumor and immune cell staining. To provide guidance on the best practices for PD-L1 testing in gastric cancer, we reviewed the literature and incorporated our extensive experience using the PD-L1 IHC PharmDx 22C3 and 28-8 assays and scoring with the combined positive score (CPS) algorithm. This review summarizes inter-reader agreement and PD-L1 assay concordance studies in gastric cancer, highlights practical challenges and pitfalls encountered in our own laboratory, and proposes solutions to address them. Accurate and consistent interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in gastric cancer is challenging, but can be improved with training, experience, and close attention to interpretation guidelines. Techniques are available that can optimize the automated staining of PharmDx PD-L1 assays using the Autostainer Link 48 to ensure consistent staining performance. The PD-L1 IHC PharmDx 22C3 and PD-L1 IHC PharmDx 28-8 assays show high concordance when used according to manufacturers' guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.