Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301859›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

The ART of Embryo Selection: A Review of Methods to Rank the Most Competent Embryo(s) for Transfer to Optimize IVF Success.

Naiya Amin, Karen Kteily, Stacy Deniz, Mehrnoosh Faghih, Megan F Karnis, Shilpa Amin, Michael S Neal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naiya AminDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-8127-2615
Karen KteilyOntario Network of Experts in Fertility (ONE Fertility), Burlington, ON L7N 3T1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1408-5186
Stacy DenizOntario Network of Experts in Fertility (ONE Fertility), Burlington, ON L7N 3T1, Canada.
Mehrnoosh FaghihOntario Network of Experts in Fertility (ONE Fertility), Burlington, ON L7N 3T1, Canada.
Megan F KarnisOntario Network of Experts in Fertility (ONE Fertility), Burlington, ON L7N 3T1, Canada.
Shilpa AminOntario Network of Experts in Fertility (ONE Fertility), Burlington, ON L7N 3T1, Canada.
Michael S NealOntario Network of Experts in Fertility (ONE Fertility), Burlington, ON L7N 3T1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-018X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the field of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), embryologists regularly face the critical task of identifying embryos with the highest likelihood of implantation and survival. To help aid and standardize this practice, many embryo selection strategies have been developed to give the best chance of pregnancy success. Over the years, there has been a large increase in experimental studies conducted within this area of research. This increase has allowed for the formation of significant and plausible theories of embryo development, especially in cases where the most prominent factors seem identical. These advancements have both expanded the typical process of traditional treatments and have even paved the way for new techniques. The exact combination of all these relevant factors has not been fully elucidated into a single all-encompassing scheme for embryo decision. Morphological, genetic, and developmental indicators are well-studied individually, but the exact methods that should be prioritized in each scenario may change with respect to an individual patient. Deciding whether factors like age, egg quality, lifestyle choices, or previous medical history should alter methods of embryo ranking can result in conflict, especially in the case where a choice is being made between two similar embryos. This article reviews the conventional methods along with emerging technologies that provide the tools for embryologists to evaluate and rank embryos with high implantation potential (HIP). By showcasing these methods, including their respective benefits and drawbacks, this article provides information to allow clinicians to make effective decisions by integrating multiple approaches to embryo selection.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologyembryo selectionIVFPGTpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41301859
PMCPMC12650140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.