ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Are Putative Beta-Lactamases Posing a Potential Future Threat?
Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a growing global health threat, with beta-lactamases playing a central role in resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. Building on our previous survey of 2340 putative beta-lactamases, we conducted an in-depth analysis of 129 prioritized candidates (70-98.5% amino acid identity to characterized enzymes) detected in 102 bacterial genera across 13 phylogenetic classes from environmental, animal, and human sources worldwide.
methodsWe applied a motif-centric assessment of class-defining catalytic residues, evaluated the genomic context using a heuristic Index of Proximal Mobility (IPM) derived from the two immediately adjacent open reading frames, and examined the phylogenetic placement. AI-based substrate predictions were generated at a restricted scope as exploratory evidence.
resultsCandidates spanned all Ambler classes (A-D); preservation of catalytic motifs was common and consistent with potential catalytic activity. Twelve of 129 (9.3%) loci had nearby mobile-element types (e.g., insertion sequences, integrases, transposases) and scored High IPM, indicating genomic contexts compatible with horizontal gene transfer. We also observed near-identical class A enzymes across multiple genera and continents, frequently adjacent to mobilization proteins.
conclusionsWe propose a reproducible, bias-aware, early warning framework that prioritizes candidates based on motif integrity and mobility context. The framework complements existing surveillance (GLASS/EARS-Net) and aligns with a One Health approach integrating human, animal, and environmental reservoirs. Identity thresholds and IPM are used for inclusion and contextual prioritization, rather than as proof of function or mobility; AI-based predictions serve as hypothesis-generating tools. Experimental studies will be essential to confirm enzymatic activity, mobility, and clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.