Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301614›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in

Taylor M Walsh, Sabrina S Plitt, Tanis C Dingle, Carmen L Charlton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taylor M WalshDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada.
Sabrina S PlittSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada.
Tanis C DingleProvincial Public Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Calgary, AB T2N 1M7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6936-406X
Carmen L CharltonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9129-5136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectives

methodsAntimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using gradient strip methodology on gonorrhea isolates from Alberta, evaluating both historical and currently recommended antimicrobials for treatment of gonorrhea. Susceptibility testing results were interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints. Provincial antimicrobial susceptibility testing data were analyzed using STATA v.17, incorporating antimicrobial resistance patterns and demographic information from provincial databases.

resultsBetween 2016 and 2022, 4056

conclusionsOngoing antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance in Alberta is crucial for identifying resistance trends and informing the development of effective treatment strategies for gonorrhea.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial susceptibility testinggonorrheaNeisseria gonorrhoeaesurveillancetrend analysis

Identifiers

PMID41301614
PMCPMC12649665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.