Observational studyBiomolecules2025
Inflammatory Biomarkers for Thrombotic Risk Assessment in Multiple Myeloma Patients on IMiD/aCD38-Based Regimens: Insights from a Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thrombosis is a common complication in multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), including thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide. When combined with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, these agents are highly effective but may increase thrombotic events (TE), potentially delaying therapy. This exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis, conducted within the MMVision mono-institutional prospective study, included 53 MM patients who initiated IMiD plus anti-CD38 therapy between May 2021 and December 2022 (median follow-up: 18 months). Treatment regimens comprised lenalidomide (n = 36) or thalidomide (n = 15) with daratumumab, and pomalidomide (n = 2) with isatuximab. Most patients (n = 38) received frontline therapy, and all were given thromboprophylaxis according to guidelines, mainly aspirin (73%). Five patients (9.4%) developed VTE after a median of 48 days, managed with short-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Exploratory analysis of 27 clinical/laboratory parameters suggested possible associations between VTE and low levels of beta-2 microglobulin, ferritin, intact/free lambda light chains, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio. Notably, four of the five VTEs occurred in patients without lytic bone disease, typically associated with bone-driven inflammation in MM. Although all patients received aspirin prophylaxis from treatment initiation, it remains unclear whether thrombosis would also have occurred among those with higher inflammatory burden. These preliminary observations may indicate that in patients with relatively lower inflammation, aspirin prophylaxis could be less effective, potentially favoring VTE onset. In two VTE cases, cytokine profiling showed decreased M-CSF, SCLF-β, and MIP-1α, with increased G-CSF, raising the hypothesis of distinct immune-inflammatory pathways contributing to TEs. Given the limited number of patients and thrombotic events, and the cytokine data available for only two VTE cases, these associations should be regarded as exploratory and interpreted with caution. Overall, these exploratory findings warrant validation in larger, independent cohorts and may help generate hypotheses on how inflammatory signatures influence thrombotic risk and prophylaxis efficacy in MM patients receiving IMiD/anti-CD38-based regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.