ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effects of Interoceptive Awareness on Recognition of and Sensitivity to Emotions in Masked Facial Stimuli.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study examined associations between presence/absence of a mask and facial emotion recognition, and how interoceptive awareness, i.e., the perception of internal bodily sensations, may influence associations between them. Eighty-two university students participated in an online behavioral experiment. Participants were required to evaluate categories of emotions as well as valence and arousal levels of facial stimuli that were either neutral or expressed one of Paul Ekman's basic emotions, i.e., anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. Participants also completed a psychological scale on interoceptive awareness. Results showed that accuracy of categorization was significantly lower and levels of valence and arousal were significantly closer to neutral in masked than in unmasked faces for multiple emotions. In addition, individuals who showed higher, as compared to lower, emotional awareness reported significantly higher levels of valence for masked stimuli that expressed surprise. These results suggest that wearing a mask can impair accuracy of facial emotion recognition and sensitivity to emotions, whereas awareness of the association between interoception and emotion might mitigate impairments of sensitivity to emotions in masked faces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.