Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301347›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of Two Measures of Agentic Engagement.

Estefania Guerrero, Georgina Guilera, Alba Aza, Juana Gómez-Benito, Maite Barrios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Estefania GuerreroDepartment of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1433-0532
Georgina GuileraDepartment of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4941-2511
Alba AzaDepartment of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatments, University of Salamanca, 37005 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1460-1195
Juana Gómez-BenitoDepartment of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4280-3106
Maite BarriosDepartment of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1979-0818

Funding

Agency for the Management of University and Research Grants of the Government of Catalonia 2021SGR01071Convocatòria d'Ajuts a la Recerca en Docència Universitària (REDICE-22) of the Institute for Professional Development of the University of Barcelona 3200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on the adaptation and psychometric validation of the Spanish versions of the Agentic Engagement Scale (AES) and the Enlarged Version of the Agentic Engagement Scale (EVAES) in Spanish undergraduate students. Agentic engagement, denoting the educational insights provided by students during classroom instruction, has garnered attention for its potential impact on teaching and learning. Reeve initially developed the AES in 2013, which Mameli and Passini extended from 5 to 10 items in 2019 to create the EVAES. In a sample of 278 undergraduate students, this study thoroughly examined various psychometric properties, including item response distribution, factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity evidence. The results consistently demonstrated high item-total correlations, a one-factor structure, good internal consistency, and satisfactory test-retest reliability for both scales. Additionally, the study established validity evidence through positive and significant correlations between agentic engagement and academic engagement, as well as with personality traits such as extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience. In conclusion, the Spanish versions of the AES and EVAES emerge as promising tools for assessing agentic engagement among Spanish-speaking undergraduate students, offering valuable insights into their active participation and contributions to the instructional process.

Indexed as

agentic engagementassessmenthigher educationreliabilitystudentsvalidity

Identifiers

PMID41301347
PMCPMC12649664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.