ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Effects of Quality of Reinforcement on the Resurgence of Responding.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study evaluated the effects of quality of reinforcement on the resurgence of target behavior responding. We defined higher- or lower-quality stimuli in terms of reinforcer potency, and specifically by the identified extent to which a reinforcer maintains responding at progressively greater response requirements. We first conducted a stimulus potency analysis to empirically derive higher- or lower-quality reinforcers using a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. We then conducted a human operant study within a three-condition resurgence evaluation with three children diagnosed with developmental disabilities. During Condition 1, target behavior responding led to higher- or lower-quality reinforcement according to a variable interval (VI) 30-s schedule of reinforcement. Following stable responding, Condition 2 delivered higher- or lower-quality reinforcement to the alternative behavior according to a VI 30-s schedule of reinforcement as target behavior responding was placed on extinction. During Condition 3, responding to both the target and alternative responses was placed on extinction. All three participants showed greater resurgence of the target behavior to a greater extent within the condition associated with higher-quality reinforcer delivery. We will discuss these results considering the importance of quality of reinforcement to both experimental and applied behavior analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.