Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301321›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Implementation Fidelity in Early Intervention for Eating Disorders-A Multisite Pilot Study.

Lucy Hyam, Lucy Gallagher, Zoe Tsivos, Sarah Macnab, Ben Kirton, Emily Palmer, Eóin Killackey, Karina L Allen, Ulrike Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucy HyamCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1857-2106
Lucy GallagherCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AB, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-4821-2691
Zoe TsivosThe Willows Centre for Health, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Lords Avenue, Salford M5 5JR, UK.
Sarah MacnabWiltshire Community Eating Disorders Service, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Wiltshire SN8 3HL, UK.
Ben KirtonOxfordshire Adult Community Eating Disorders Service, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.
Emily PalmerSussex Eating Disorder Service, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing BN2 3EW, UK.
Eóin KillackeyOrygen, 35 Poplar Rd., Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9649-5551
Karina L AllenCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2896-6459
Ulrike SchmidtCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1335-1937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) is an early intervention service model and care pathway for young people aged 16-25 with a recent-onset eating disorder. This multi-site study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a newly developed implementation fidelity tool and observe patterns of fidelity to FREED. Six eating disorder services across England took part in an assessment. Data were collected from 242 patient referrals between January and June 2025 and via semi-structured interviews with FREED staff. Total fidelity scores were calculated alongside two component scores (rapid access to the service and early intervention care package), and inter-rater agreement was assessed. The tool was feasible to use across multiple services, time efficient, aligned with existing workflows, and demonstrated high inter-rater agreement. The average fidelity score across services was 72% ('medium fidelity'). The average component scores were 57% for rapid access targets ('not satisfactory') and 77% for early intervention care package ('medium fidelity'). Rapid access target scores were highly variable across services (20-87%), whereas care package scores were more consistent (72-82%). Additional sustained resource augmentation is needed to improve model adherence and facilitate consistent access to high-quality early intervention for eating disorders, including support to meet rapid access targets.

Indexed as

early interventioneating disordersfidelityimplementationservice development

Identifiers

PMID41301321
PMCPMC12649207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.