Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301287›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

What Can We Learn from the Previous Research on the Symptoms of Selective Mutism? A Systematic Review.

Judith Kleinheinrich, Felix Vogel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Youth with selective mutism: a nationwide patient registry study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Judith KleinheinrichDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Felix VogelDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-274X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate understanding of a mental disorder's symptomatology is essential for valid diagnosis, differential assessment, and treatment planning. It is therefore remarkable that failure to speak is defined as the only symptom in the diagnostic criteria of selective mutism (SM) in current classification systems. This narrow definition may not reflect the full range of difficulties experienced by affected children. This systematic review aimed to synthesize empirical findings on the broader symptomatology of SM across diverse study designs, informants, and assessment methods. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and APA PsycNet, leading to 82 studies with participant samples (beyond single case reports) included in the final analysis. Results indicated that social and unspecific anxiety were the most frequently assessed and consistently identified symptoms. However, additional features-including withdrawal, depressive symptoms, social skill deficits, and, in qualitative accounts, externalizing and oppositional behaviors-were also documented. The observed symptom diversity varied notably across assessment methods and informants. Our findings support a multisymptomatic understanding of SM and suggest that failure to speak alone do not fully account for its clinical presentation. A more differentiated conceptualization may enhance diagnostic precision, inform individualized intervention strategies, and contribute to discussions on refining diagnostic frameworks.

Indexed as

anxietyassessmentchildrendiagnosticsselective mutismsymptomssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41301287
PMCPMC12649584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.