ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Two-Step Variable Selection Strategy for Multiply Imputed Survival Data Using Penalized Cox Models.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of competing-risk nomograms and identification of optimal candidates for aggressive therapy in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: a population-based study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Socio-ecological factors of health literacy and physical activity among middle-aged and older Chinese adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Socio-ecological correlates of exercise procrastination and exercise addiction: a preliminary exploratory study using a single-university sample.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple imputation (MI) is widely used for handling missing data. However, applying penalized methods after MI can be challenging because variable selection may be inconsistent across imputations. We propose a two-step variable selection method for multiply imputed datasets with survival outcomes: apply LASSO or ALASSO to each MI dataset, followed by ridge regression, and combine estimates using variable selected in any or d% (d = 50, 70, 90, 100) of the MI datasets. For comparison, we also fit stacked MI datasets with weighted penalized regression and a group LASSO approach that enforces consistent selection across imputations. Simulations with Cox models evaluated tuning by AIC, BIC, cross-validation at the minimum error, and the 1SE rule. Across scenarios, performance differed by both the penalization and the selection rule. More conservative choices such as ALASSO with BIC and a 50% inclusion frequency tended to control false positive and gave more stable calibration. The grouped approach achieved comparable selection with modestly higher estimation error. Overall, no single method consistently outperformed others across all scenarios. Our findings suggest that practitioners should weigh trade-offs between selection stability, estimation accuracy, and calibration when applying penalized methods to multiply imputed survival data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.