ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Anatomically Guided Cascaded U-Net Ensemble for Coronary Artery Calcification Segmentation in Cardiac CT.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of coronary artery calcifications (CAC) from cardiac CT is challenged by class imbalance, small lesion size, and anatomical ambiguity. We present an anatomically guided, cascaded framework that couples heart and vessel priors with a heterogeneous U-Net ensemble for robust, vessel-aware CAC segmentation. First, a ResU-Net trained on MM-WHS isolates the heart region of interest (ROI). Second, a ResU-Net trained on ASOCA-using Frangi vesselness enhancement-segments the coronary arteries, yielding vessel masks that constrain downstream lesion detection. Third, calcifications are segmented within the vessel-constrained ROI using an ensemble of U-Net variants (baseline U-Net, Residual U-Net, Attention U-Net, UNet++). At inference, a rank-based selective fusion strategy prioritizes predictions with strong morphological consistency and vessel conformity, suppressing false positives. On the Stanford COCA gated dataset, the proposed ensemble outperforms individual models (Dice 84.25%, sensitivity 87.10%, specificity 98.00%), with ablations demonstrating additional gains when vessel priors are integrated into selective fusion (Dice 85.50%, sensitivity 88.53%). Results confirm that combining dataset-specific anatomical priors with selective ensembling improves boundary sharpness, small-lesion detectability, and anatomical plausibility, supporting reliable CAC segmentation in clinical imaging workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.