ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Non-Linear Modeling of Motor Development in Typically Developing Children and Youth Aged 5-18 Years Using Robot-Based Behavioral Assessments.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical tasks are often used to differentiate the motor performance of individuals who have impaired function. However, these are not as accurate and repeatable as robotic tasks. Additionally, motor development occurs rapidly at early ages and slows as they reach adulthood, resulting in a non-linear model of performance. There is also evidence that variability in performance changes as children and youth age. Accurate normative models of performance are necessary to identify deficiencies in motor performance and to track the efficacy of therapies. This work aimed to create normative models of motor development based on robotic assessments in typically developing children and youth. Two hundred and eighty-eight participants who are typically developing (ages 5-18) completed a robotic point-to-point reaching task and an object-hitting task using the Kinarm Exoskeleton. Exponential or quadratic curves were fit to performance parameters generated by Kinarm to model typical performance. These models included a linear term to account for changing variabilities with age. Most performance parameters showed improvement with age, and none showed deterioration. Some parameters showed large changes in variability in performance with age, with up to a 74% decrease in the range of typical performance. Reduced variability occurs with age, indicating the need to account for differences in variability when developing models of typical motor performance in children and youth. The models that are used to identify deficits in motor performance should account for changing variability in data and changing repeatability with age to increase the accuracy of identification of deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.