ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Personalized Design of 3D-Printed Osteochondral Scaffold for Osteoarthritis Patients with Different Bone Conditions and Mechanical Evaluation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As osteoarthritis is a common disease in elderly people and large cartilage defects can only be treated by joint replacement surgery, a scaffold is seen as a potential treatment that could help patients to delay or avoid surgery. An ideal scaffold should have similar properties to the surrounding tissues. Thus, for different levels of OA, patients with different bone properties should use different scaffold structures with different mechanical or biological properties. In this paper five structures (A-E) are designed for young OA patients or patients with good bone mechanical properties, middle-age OA patients with weak bone mechanical properties or patients with little osteoporosis, and elderly OA patients who have severer OA and osteoporosis who are not able to perform normal activities. And these five scaffold structures are 3D-printed by an EOS machine with Ti6Al4V powder and evaluated by experiments based on a biomechanical bioreactor simulating the human knee joint and simulation through ANSYS. Structure D with a solid thick beam in the middle has the highest loading force, which is 3707.835 N, and structure E, composed of the polyhedron with the highest specific surface area, has the lowest loading force, which is 1837.402 N. Structures A, B, and C are intended for young OA patients or patients with good bone mechanical properties. Structures D and E are designed for patients who need to avoid or delay joint replacement surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.