ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimization of Gamma Image Quality Through Experimental Evaluation Using 3D-Printed Phantoms Across Energy Window Levels.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Energy window selection is a critical parameter for optimizing planar gamma image quality in nuclear medicine. In this study, we developed dedicated nuclear medicine phantoms using 3D printing technology to evaluate the impact of varying energy window levels on image quality. Three types of phantoms-a Derenzo phantom with six different sphere diameters, a modified Hoffman phantom incorporating lead for attenuation, and a quadrant bar phantom with four bar thicknesses constructed from bronze filament-were fabricated using Fusion 360 and an Ultimaker S5 3D printer with PLA and bronze-based materials. Planar images were acquired using 37 MBq of Tc-99m for 60 s at energy windows centered at 122, 140, and 159 keV. Quantitative assessments included contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), coefficient of variation (COV), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM), comparing all images with the 140 keV image as the reference. The results showed a consistent decline in image quality at 122 keV and 159 keV, with the highest CNR, lowest COV, and optimal PSNR/SSIM values obtained at 140 keV. In visual analysis using the quadrant bar phantom, thinner bars were more clearly discernible at 140 keV than at other energy levels. These findings demonstrate that the application of an appropriate energy window-particularly 140 keV for Tc-99m-substantially improves image quality in planar gamma imaging. The use of customized, material-specific 3D-printed phantoms also enables flexible, reproducible evaluation protocols for energy-dependent imaging optimization and quality assurance in clinical nuclear medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.