ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Rotational Gait Problems in the Presence of Femoral Deformity.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between femoral deformity and gait deviation is complex. Femoral anteversion can be assessed using the trochanter prominence angle test or by imaging techniques. Hip rotation during gait can be determined using conventional 3D gait analysis methods including palpation of femoral epicondyles or by using functional calibration. This study re-evaluates the indications for femoral osteotomies in this context. Hip rotation was analysed using predictive and functional methods in 80 patients who were referred for gait analysis due to rotational gait issues. Femoral anteversion was determined both manually and via MRI. In severe cases of femoral malalignment, the trochanter prominence angle test systematically underestimates the deformity by up to 15° compared to MRI results. Hip rotation, as measured by functional methods, also underestimates the outcome obtained by conventional methods, by up to 5°. Regardless of the method used, significant variability in hip rotation is observed during gait when the femoral deformation is moderate (anteversion between 0° and 30°). More severe deformities are not fully compensated for during gait. In cases of severe femoral malalignment, the functional change after osteotomy does not match the amount of derotation. Furthermore, both the trochanter prominence angle test and hip rotation during gait, as monitored via functional methods, underestimate the problem in the transverse plane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.