Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301164›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Rotational Gait Problems in the Presence of Femoral Deformity.

Arik Rehani Musagara, Firooz Salami, Cornelia Putz, Nicholas A Beckmann, Marco Götze, Sebastian I Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arik Rehani MusagaraCenter for Orthopedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Firooz SalamiCenter for Orthopedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6275-3962
Cornelia PutzCenter for Orthopedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicholas A BeckmannCenter for Orthopedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Marco GötzeCenter for Orthopedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian I WolfCenter for Orthopedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3921-6629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between femoral deformity and gait deviation is complex. Femoral anteversion can be assessed using the trochanter prominence angle test or by imaging techniques. Hip rotation during gait can be determined using conventional 3D gait analysis methods including palpation of femoral epicondyles or by using functional calibration. This study re-evaluates the indications for femoral osteotomies in this context. Hip rotation was analysed using predictive and functional methods in 80 patients who were referred for gait analysis due to rotational gait issues. Femoral anteversion was determined both manually and via MRI. In severe cases of femoral malalignment, the trochanter prominence angle test systematically underestimates the deformity by up to 15° compared to MRI results. Hip rotation, as measured by functional methods, also underestimates the outcome obtained by conventional methods, by up to 5°. Regardless of the method used, significant variability in hip rotation is observed during gait when the femoral deformation is moderate (anteversion between 0° and 30°). More severe deformities are not fully compensated for during gait. In cases of severe femoral malalignment, the functional change after osteotomy does not match the amount of derotation. Furthermore, both the trochanter prominence angle test and hip rotation during gait, as monitored via functional methods, underestimate the problem in the transverse plane.

Indexed as

femoral derotation osteotomyfunctional calibrationhip rotationkinematicsknee joint axistrochanter prominence angle test

Identifiers

PMID41301164
PMCPMC12649406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.