Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301132›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Prognostic Evaluation of Lower Third Molar Eruption Status from Panoramic Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence-Supported Machine and Deep Learning Models.

Ipek N Guldiken, Alperen Tekin, Tunahan Kanbak, Emine N Kahraman, Mutlu Özcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ipek N GuldikenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istinye University, Ayazağa Mahallesi, Azerbaycan Caddesi, Vadistanbul 4A Blok, 34396 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1266-7913
Alperen TekinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Fatih Mahallesi, Eski Ankara Asfaltı Caddesi No:28, 34956 Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0604-0287
Tunahan KanbakIndependent Researcher, 8032 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0002-6591-3663
Emine N KahramanFaculty of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Istinye University, Ayazağa, Defne Street No:1 Apartment:34408, 34408 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9942-8303
Mutlu ÖzcanClinic of Masticatory Disorders and Dental Biomaterials, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-6098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prophylactic extraction of third molars is highly dependent on the surgeon's experience as the common practices and guidelines contradict. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the eruption status of impacted third molars using deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) and to develop a model that predicts their final positions at an early stage to aid clinical decisions. In this retrospective study, 1102 panoramic radiographs (PANs) were annotated by three expert dentists to classify eruption status as either initial or definitive. A dataset was created and two deep learning architectures, InceptionV3 and ResNet50, were tested through a three-phase protocol: hyperparameter tuning, model evaluation, and assessment of preprocessing effects. Accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score were used as performance metrics. Classical machine learning (ML) algorithms (SVM, KNN, and logistic regression) were also applied to features extracted from the deep models. ResNet50 with preprocessing achieved the best performance (F1 score: 0.829). Models performed better with definitive cases than with initial ones, where performance dropped (F1 score: 0.705). Clinically, the model predicted full eruption or impaction with 83% and 75% accuracy, respectively, but showed lower accuracy for partial impactions. These results suggest that AI can support early prediction of third molar eruption status and enhance clinical decision-making. Deep learning models (particularly ResNet50) demonstrated promising results in predicting third molar eruption outcomes. With larger datasets and improved optimization, AI tools may achieve greater accuracy and support routine clinical applications.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningpanoramic radiographsprognostic assessmentthird molar eruption

Identifiers

PMID41301132
PMCPMC12649670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.