ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Prognostic Evaluation of Lower Third Molar Eruption Status from Panoramic Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence-Supported Machine and Deep Learning Models.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Deep Learning Model for Second-Molar Lesions Related to Impacted Third Molars.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Third Molar Segmentation Performance Between Sexes Using Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prophylactic extraction of third molars is highly dependent on the surgeon's experience as the common practices and guidelines contradict. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the eruption status of impacted third molars using deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) and to develop a model that predicts their final positions at an early stage to aid clinical decisions. In this retrospective study, 1102 panoramic radiographs (PANs) were annotated by three expert dentists to classify eruption status as either initial or definitive. A dataset was created and two deep learning architectures, InceptionV3 and ResNet50, were tested through a three-phase protocol: hyperparameter tuning, model evaluation, and assessment of preprocessing effects. Accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score were used as performance metrics. Classical machine learning (ML) algorithms (SVM, KNN, and logistic regression) were also applied to features extracted from the deep models. ResNet50 with preprocessing achieved the best performance (F1 score: 0.829). Models performed better with definitive cases than with initial ones, where performance dropped (F1 score: 0.705). Clinically, the model predicted full eruption or impaction with 83% and 75% accuracy, respectively, but showed lower accuracy for partial impactions. These results suggest that AI can support early prediction of third molar eruption status and enhance clinical decision-making. Deep learning models (particularly ResNet50) demonstrated promising results in predicting third molar eruption outcomes. With larger datasets and improved optimization, AI tools may achieve greater accuracy and support routine clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.