Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301129›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

An Explainable AI Framework for Corneal Imaging Interpretation and Refractive Surgery Decision Support.

Mini Han Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mini Han WangZhuhai People's Hospital (The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University), Zhuhai 519000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5002-3708

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82501368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces an explainable neuro-symbolic and large language model (LLM)-driven framework for intelligent interpretation of corneal topography and precision surgical decision support. In a prospective cohort of 20 eyes, comprehensive IOLMaster 700 reports were analyzed through a four-stage pipeline: (1) automated extraction of key parameters-including corneal curvature, pachymetry, and axial biometry; (2) mapping of these quantitative features onto a curated corneal disease and refractive-surgery knowledge graph; (3) Bayesian probabilistic inference to evaluate early keratoconus and surgical eligibility; and (4) explainable multi-model LLM reporting, employing DeepSeek and GPT-4.0, to generate bilingual physician- and patient-facing narratives. By transforming complex imaging data into transparent reasoning chains, the pipeline delivered case-level outputs within ~95 ± 12 s. When benchmarked against independent evaluations by two senior corneal specialists, the framework achieved 92 ± 4% sensitivity, 94 ± 5% specificity, 93 ± 4% accuracy, and an AUC of 0.95 ± 0.03 for early keratoconus detection, alongside an F1 score of 0.90 ± 0.04 for refractive surgery eligibility. The generated bilingual reports were rated ≥4.8/5 for logical clarity, clinical usefulness, and comprehensibility, with representative cases fully concordant with expert judgment. Comparative benchmarking against baseline CNN and ViT models demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.95 ± 0.03 vs. 0.88 and 0.90,

Indexed as

corneal bioengineeringcorneal topographyexplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)large language model (LLM)neuro-symbolic techniquessurgical decision support

Identifiers

PMID41301129
PMCPMC12649685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.