ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Accuracy and Precision of Model-Based Tracking of a Dynamic Hop Landing Activity.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Passive Laxity With Functional Stability Reveals Potential Bilateral Dynamic Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction at Long-term Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biplane videoradiography (BVR) is the preferred 3D imaging modality for investigating the relationship between sub-millimeter knee kinematic abnormalities and posttraumatic osteoarthritis risk following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and surgery. Activity-specific BVR system geometries maximize BVR's limited field of view which, in turn, influences downstream accuracy. The present work aimed to quantify the accuracy, bias, and precision of the reconstructed 3D tibiofemoral kinematics within a BVR system configured to capture the landing phase of a one-leg hop-for-distance activity. Radio-opaque beads were implanted into the femurs and tibiae of three cadaveric knees to provide the gold-standard kinematics. The specimens were moved through the BVR field of view simulating hop and drop landing motions such that the motion trajectories could better approximate dynamic in vivo velocities. The motions were tracked using both marker- and model-based methods. The mean absolute difference in kinematics between the two tracking methods was used to describe accuracy. Bland-Altman tests were used to quantify bias and precision. Kinematic accuracy ranged from 0.30 to 0.39° for rotations and from 0.34 to 0.50 mm for translations. The magnitudes of absolute difference, bias, and precision were similar regardless of the amount of soft tissue present or velocity of the simulated movement. Our results indicate that our approach for capturing BVR-derived kinematics for a one-leg hop-for-distance is sufficiently accurate to capture the magnitude of differences we expect to observe in a clinical population of ACL-reconstructed patients at long-term follow-up and will be useful to other investigators who may wish to record the hop-for-distance activity using the system geometry and image capture settings described here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.