ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Capturing Compensatory Reserve in Sarcopenia: A Bioengineering Framework for Multidimensional Temporal Analysis of Center-of-Pressure Signals.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional balance assessments often miss subtle deficits in sarcopenia patients due to compensatory strategies. This study develops a computational framework using multidimensional temporal analysis of center-of-pressure (COP) signals to quantify variations in compensatory reserve-the capacity to mask balance impairments-within these patients. COP data were collected from 82 older adults (sarcopenia vs. controls) during static standing on a standard clinical force platform (routine for geriatric balance testing). The framework integrates Dynamic Time Warping distances from a healthy template, fixed-weight LSTM embeddings, and statistical metrics, with feature selection and 5-fold cross-validation (SMOTE) to mitigate overfitting. Semi-tandem stance was most discriminative, achieving 0.84 ± 0.04 accuracy and 0.86 ± 0.05 ROC-AUC-outperforming conventional kinematic features. SHAP analysis identified DTW-based features as primary drivers, correlating with clinical severity indicators, while intra-group variability in prediction probabilities indicated a compensatory reserve gradient. This study introduces a feasible bioengineering methodology based on clinical COP platform analysis, laying the groundwork for future validation and translation into routine clinical assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.