ReviewCancers2025
Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy for Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed Patients, Transplant Recipients, and Individuals with Hereditary Syndromes: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common skin cancer, with incidence steadily increasing due to cumulative ultraviolet (UV) exposure, impaired immune surveillance, and chronic tissue damage. While most cases are effectively managed with surgical excision, a subset progress to locally advanced or metastatic disease, associated with high recurrence rates, limited curative options, and poor prognosis. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has significantly altered the management of advanced cSCC. Cemiplimab and pembrolizumab are now established systemic therapies, producing durable responses in a proportion of patients. These outcomes reflect the typically high tumor mutational burden and immunogenic microenvironment of cSCC. However, therapeutic decision-making remains particularly complex in several high-risk populations, including solid organ transplant recipients at risk of allograft rejection, patients with chronic dermatologic disorders or non-healing wounds that predispose to carcinogenesis, and individuals with rare hereditary syndromes such as recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. These so-called challenging populations are frequently excluded from pivotal trials, resulting in limited evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment strategies. This review summarizes current evidence on the management of advanced cSCC in high-risk and underserved patient groups, integrating trial data, real-world evidence, and contemporary guidelines. It also highlights key gaps in knowledge and outlines future directions, with particular focus on the interplay between host immune status, tumor biology, and therapeutic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.