Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301040›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

The Role of Quantitative Ultrasound in Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Hanna Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hanna Piotrzkowska-WróblewskaUltrasound Department, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

Polpharma Scientific Foundation 1/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used, particularly in aggressive subtypes such as HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, where achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) is strongly associated with improved outcomes. Early and accurate assessment of therapeutic response is therefore essential to enable timely treatment adaptation. Conventional imaging methods-including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), mammography, and B-mode ultrasound-mainly detect macroscopic tumor shrinkage and often lagging behind biological alterations, as they rely primarily on size-based assessment. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an emerging, non-invasive technique that analyzes raw radiofrequency (RF) ultrasound data to extract spectral, scattering, and attenuation parameters, allowing detailed characterization of tumor microstructure. When combined with parametric mapping, texture analysis, and advanced radiomic or deep learning approaches, QUS can capture subtle tissue alterations at an early stage of therapy and help predict pathological response before conventional imaging detects morphologic change. Integration with molecular and clinical data further enhances predictive performance, enabling adaptive and personalized treatment strategies. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the clinical utility of QUS in monitoring NAC response in breast cancer, outlines the methodological foundations of this technology, and discusses key challenges to its broader implementation-particularly the need for standardized acquisition and processing protocols, robust interpretive algorithms and large, prospective, multicenter validations to confirm its impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes, and to accelerate its translation into precision oncology practice.

Indexed as

breast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyquantitative ultrasound (QUS)treatment response monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41301040
PMCPMC12650719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.