RapidPlan Knowledge-Based Radiotherapy Planning Compared to Manual Planning in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Clinical implementation of automated IMRT/VMAT planning for lung cancer radiation therapy using the expedited constrained hierarchical optimization (ECHO) system.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026
   Article
2. PlanningCopilot: An agentic framework integrating ESAPI modules for autonomous treatment planning in lung radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026
   Article
3. Optimization of Automated Radiotherapy Planning for Head and Neck Cancers and Brain Tumors Using Knowledge-Based Planning Models.Cancers · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as